How Trump Went From ‘Tough On Crime’ To ‘Second Chance’ For Felons


By Ayesha Rascoe
December 17, 2018

The Senate will begin considering a bill on Monday, December 17, that would reduce federal sentences for certain drug offenses and prepare prisoners for life after incarceration.

If the bill becomes law, a major reason will be the support it received from a surprising booster: President Trump.

Trump has made being “tough on crime” one of his calling cards. But, after months of a mostly behind-the-scenes campaign from some of his closest advisers, Trump threw his backing behind legislation that would roll back some of the stiff penalties enacted in response to the so-called “war on drugs.”

Trump’s endorsement of the Senate’s First Step Act stands in stark contrast to some of the rhetoric he has employed while in office and marks a break with some of the policies enacted by his own Justice Department.

Among other things, the legislation would promote prison rehabilitation programs and end automatic life sentences under the three-strike penalty for certain felonies.

The president’s first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, was a staunch opponent of any changes reducing federal sentencing for crimes.

Sessions rescinded Obama administration guidance that sought to shorten sentences for non-violent drug offenders. Instead, Sessions directed prosecutors to seek the toughest punishments allowed under the law.

With the U.S. facing a drug overdose epidemic, Trump, too, at times has argued that drug dealers are not punished enough. He has even talked about wanting to utilize the death penalty against drug traffickers.

“We are really going after the traffickers; I have always said that’s the biggest thing,” Trump said in August. “And, frankly, the punishment is getting stronger and stronger. Maybe, at some point, we’ll get very smart as a nation and give them the ultimate punishment.”

Advocates in his inner circle
So, how did Trump wind up coming out in favor of a bill aimed at giving a second chance to people who commit crime?

A major influence on his decision was his son-in-law and White House adviser Jared Kushner.

“This bill would have been dead on arrival without Jared Kushner,” said David Safavian, who works for the American Conservative Union Foundation, which supports this new Senate legislation.

“He’s been able to make the case to the president as to why this is good for neighborhoods, good for the economy, good for individuals and good for families,” Safavian said.

Kushner, whose father served time in federal prison, has led the charge in the White House to make changes to the U.S. criminal justice system.

He found allies for this cause in conservative groups like Safavian’s and among some of Trump’s powerful evangelical supporters.

These groups and their progressive counterparts argue that unreasonably long sentences have clogged up U.S. prisons, costing taxpayer dollars without lowering crime rates.

At White House round table meetings, advocates like Shon Hopwood told Trump that there were better ways to crack down on crime.

Hopwood met with Trump earlier this year.

“What I told the president was… I committed a violent crime but I am not a violent criminal and that people can change,” Hopwood said. “And the law should recognize that.”

Hopwood is now a law professor at Georgetown University, but he spent nearly 11 years in prison for bank robbery. He says he thinks hearing stories like his made Trump look at prisoners differently.

The push to persuade Trump seems to have paid off.

After supporting a more limited bill in the House, last month Trump came out in favor of the more expansive Senate bill.

It also likely helped that Sessions was pushed out as attorney general in November.

Without Trump’s endorsement, the bill almost certainly wouldn’t have come up for a vote.

Safavian says unlike other politicians, Trump benefits from not having to worry about opponents painting him as “weak” on crime.

He describes the logic this way: “You know Donald Trump is tough on crime. Donald Trump endorses this bill — therefore this bill is not soft on crime.”

“Donald Trump advancing conservative criminal justice reform is analogous to as Nixon going to China — only a Republican who’s tough on crime could achieve the success that we are on the verge of reaching,” Safavian added.

Even with Trump’s support, the bill has faced intense criticism from Republicans like Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas. Cotton argues the bill “goes soft on some of the worst crimes” and that it will allow violent criminals out of prison early.

Backers of the bill dispute Cotton’s arguments. They say it only allows for limited and strictly supervised release and that it only applies to prisoners who are not considered high risk.

But, even some of those that support the legislation, say that Trump’s harsh language about crime and some of the actions by his administration are at odds with the bill’s goals.

“This administration has a very mixed record on criminal justice reform,” said Inimai Chettiar, of the Brennan Center for Justice, which has come out in favor of the First Step Act in the Senate.

Chettiar pointed to Sessions’ reversal of the Obama era sentencing provisions as a harmful development under President Trump.

“They have been using extremely dangerous rhetoric around crime, particularly as it relates to immigration … and also using a lot of ‘war on drugs’ rhetoric that not only is dangerous, but also those policies are just ineffective,” she said.

Some on the left argue the Senate bill doesn’t go far enough, though. They say it excludes a lot of people already in prison serving long sentences, who they believe should be offered some relief.

Breon Wells, a political strategist who advises activists on ending mass incarceration, says he’s worried that Trump’s mixed messages on crime may lead the Justice Department to not fully implement the law.

“Do we have good faith, long term, committed partners in this so that this first step doesn’t become something where everyone pats themselves on the back… and then we don’t revisit this for another five, 10 or even 20 years?” Wells said.

Questions Using Close Reading and Critical Thinking:

  1. The first section of an article should answer the questions “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, and “Where?” Identify the four Ws of this article. (Note: The rest of the news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
  2. Does this article have any bias? Why or why not?
  3. Trump is supporting the Senate’s First Step Act, a new legislation proposed on Monday, December 17. What is the purpose of this act? What are three provisions stated in the article? For a more detailed explanation of these provisions, look here:
  4. Due in part to the opioid epidemic, Trump stated that drug dealers should be severely punished and even referred to the death penalty for traffickers. He prided himself on being “tough on crime.” Which close family member was instrumental in changing his mind, and what happened to this family member to make him be an advocate of the bill?
  5. Shon Hopwood informed the President that there are “better ways to crack down on crime.” Who is Hopwood, and what role did he play in influencing Trump’s decision?
  6. Based on Hopwood’s story, do you feel non-violent drug offenders can change, given enough counseling and rehabilitation?
  7. Those in favor of this legislation have noted President Trump’s change of heart and are concerned. Do you think legislators have legitimate reasons to be concerned? Why or why not?
  8. Do you think this bill will be effective? Write five to seven sentences on why you feel it will be effective or ineffective.