CNN
By Holly Yan
January 14, 2019
This is the outcome nobody wanted. But it’s happening anyway.
More
than 32,000 Los Angeles teachers and staff members are walking off the
job Monday in the country’s second-biggest school district. That means
about 600,000 kids will have no idea when they’ll see their teachers
again.
Weeks of heated negotiations between the United Teachers
Los Angeles (UTLA) union and the Los Angeles Unified School District
(LAUSD) went nowhere, leading to the city’s first teachers’ strike in 30
years.
Both the union and the school district say they want
smaller class sizes, bigger teacher salaries, and more counselors and
nurses in the district’s roughly 1,000 schools.
The big debate revolves around how much to fund them.
While the adults keep struggling to find a resolution, students are still expected to go to school during the strike.
Despite
the expected absences of 32,000 teachers and staff, classes will
continue at all schools. About 600,000 students could be taught by more
than 2,000 reassigned administrators and about 400 substitute teachers,
the school district said.
Exactly how that will work out logistically remains uncertain.
“It’s case by case, school by school,” said Shannon Haber, chief communications officer for LAUSD.
But
the massive teachers[‘] shortage Monday is enough to make Andrew Krowne
keep his four LAUSD children home for as long as the strike lasts.
“It’s just a sheer overwhelming number of children versus adults,” he said. “I’m not risking my children’s safety.”
Numbers and accusations fly
While
both UTLA and LAUSD have made some concessions, both the union and the
school district accuse the other of giving misleading facts and figures.
In
LAUSD’s latest offer to the union Friday, the school district said it
“would add nearly 1,200 more educators—teachers, counselors, nurses and
librarians—in schools, reducing class size in thousands of classrooms.”
Class
sizes in grades four to six would be limited to 35 students, and class
sizes in all middle and high school math and English classes would be
limited to 39 students, the school district said.
The offer would
also “ensure no increase in any class size, increase nurses, counselors
and librarians at all schools, along with a 6% salary increase and back
pay for the 2017-2018 school year,” LAUSD said.
But union
president Alex Caputo-Pearl said the offer was good for only one year
and that the school district’s proposal was “woefully inadequate.”
The
union wants LAUSD to pull from its $1.86 billion in reserves to
increase school staffing and to boost teachers’ salaries by 6.5%.
But the school district says it’s not nearly as wealthy as the teachers’ union suggests.
“School
budgets in California are set in three-year increments, and from July
2018 to June 2021, Los Angeles Unified will spend $24 billion educating
students. This includes its entire, existing $1.8 billion reserve,”
LAUSD said.
The school district said at this rate, it might not
even have enough money to meet a required 1% reserve by the 2021-2022
school year.
“Our commitment to our families is to make sure all
of the money we have is being spent in schools. We are doing that,”
LAUSD Superintendent Austin Beutner said in a statement.
The
financial situation is so bad, the Los Angeles County Office of
Education is stepping in. Last week, the state-funded regulatory agency
assigned fiscal experts to work with the school district on a plan to
“eliminate deficit spending and restore required financial reserve
levels.”
And the Los Angeles school board has ordered the
superintendent to come up with a three-year “enterprise plan” to get
more revenue by March 18. That plan “could include parcel tax and school
bond measures, as well as strategies for increasing enrollment.”
600,000 kids / 2,400 substitutes and administrators = 1 logistical nightmare
The
big question for parents during the strike is whether to send their
children to school. Many are concerned about so few adults replacing
32,000 missing educators.
LAUSD tried to alleviate concerns,
urging parents to “keep kids safe and learning in school.” It created a
strike hotline for parents and is accommodating special-needs students
at early education centers.
But Krowne, the father of four LAUSD
students, said he’s keeping his kids home—even though the school
district will not excuse students’ absences due to the strike.
He
said one daughter was instructed to report to the auditorium, then
rotate to the lunch area, then to the gymnasium, then to the outdoor
field.
“If five teachers showed up, everyone’s going to be watching movies in the auditorium,” he predicted.
“There’s
not instruction happening. Why… would I send my kids to daycare with
hundreds and hundreds of kids? My kids would be safer at home with their
parents. Frankly, my kids will learn more at home.”
But Evelyn
Alemán said she’s sending her daughter to school, even if she’s taught
by someone other than her regular teachers. She said any school
instruction is better than nothing.
For some other parents “it’s a
toss-up,” Alemán said. “For those parents who have children who have
special needs, in special education, they’re just not sure if the folks
who are taking care of them that day will be able to support the needs
of their children.”
‘Parents are caught in the middle’
While the union and school district are stuck at an impasse, parents are also in a difficult position.
“I
feel like parents are caught in the middle of these two big forces that
are in charge of looking out for our children,” said Alemán, the mother
of a 14-year-old high school freshman.
“I think most parents
agree with what the teachers are asking for. We definitely want smaller
class sizes. We definitely want teachers to be appropriately
compensated,” she said.
But as far as the strike goes, “I don’t agree with the way it’s taking place right now.”
Krowne
disagrees. He said by pulling his kids out of school, he’s making a
statement in support of the teachers’ strike. And if enough parents do
the same, it will get the school district’s attention.
“My older children understand,” he said. “They know what it’s like to be in a mixed (grade) class of 36 or 35 students.”
Questions Using Close Reading and Critical Thinking:
- The first section of an article should answer the questions “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, and “Where?” Identify the four Ws of this article. (Note: The rest of the news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
- Does this article have any bias? Why or why not?
- Why did the teachers in Los Angeles go on strike Monday? What are the three main requests the union is demanding from the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD)?
- This is Los Angeles’ first teachers’ strike in 30 years. The last teacher strike took place in 1989. How long did it last, what were the demands, and what was the outcome? Was the strike similar to this one? Search for answers in this article from the Los Angeles Daily News: https://www.dailynews.com/2019/01/12/lausd-teachers-went-on-strike-in-1989-but-are-the-stakes-higher-in-2019/
- The union wants $1.86 billion in reserves from the LAUSD, but the district is saying $1.8 billion of that is intended for the school budget for July 2018 to June 2021. As a result, the superintendent is being ordered to create a three-year “enterprise plan.” What does that entail, and how could it potentially free up more funds and increase revenue? How would you propose finding funds to fulfill the union’s demands? Research online if necessary.
- About 2,400 administrators and substitute teachers are stepping in for the 32,000 educators that are absent. Because of this, parents are torn on whether to keep their children in school or at home. If you were a parent in this situation, what would you do? What is your reasoning for doing so?
- What do you think will be the outcome of these negotiations? Do you think the union and LAUSD will come to an agreement in which both sides will be happy? Why or why not?
Click here to view more: www.cnn.com/2019/01/14/us/los-angeles-teachers-strike/index.html