Will D.C. Become the 51st State? Advocates Argue Case in Congress with Boost from Democrats

Rachael ManvilleSocial StudiesLeave a Comment

September 19, 2019
Nicholas Wu
USA Today
Lexile: 1100L–1200L

WASHINGTON—Legislation under consideration in the House of Representatives could make Washington, D.C., the 51st state. 

The bill, aptly named “H.R. 51,” was debated Thursday morning before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform in the first House hearing on statehood since 1993.

The district’s single nonvoting member of Congress, Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, a Democrat, sponsors the bill, which has the backing of most House Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., a presidential candidate, tweeted in support of the statehood push.  

“Washington D.C. residents deserve an equal voice in our government—they deserve statehood now,” she wrote.

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro, and businessman Tom Steyer also offered support for statehood.

U.S. territories Guam and Puerto Rico have also voiced their concerns about greater representation in Congress.

Democrats called statehood advocates such as D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and City Council Chairman Phil Mendelson to speak at the hearing. Roger Pilon of the libertarian Cato Institute spoke in opposition. 

Statehood has been a long-standing goal of advocates, who say the district’s status amounts to the “voter suppression” of a majority-minority city. 

Opponents say D.C. statehood would pose practical and constitutional challenges. 

How would this work? 

The bill would lay the groundwork for the admission of a new state called Washington, Douglass Commonwealth, which would be represented by two senators and one member of Congress. 

Its territory would encompass all of D.C.’s land, except for around monuments and federal buildings such as the White House and Capitol building. 

The bill does not give many details about the separation of city services and funding from the federal government, something sure to pose logistical challenges. 

The Constitution gives Congress the ability to set its own conditions for admitting a state. Under the Admission Clause, “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union.”

An American Civil Liberties Union analysis of the bill found it “permissible” based on constitutional interpretations. “It complies with the District and Federal Enclaves Clause, the Admission Clause, and the Twenty-Third Amendment,” the ACLU concluded. 

Why isn’t D.C. already a state? 

The Constitution is vague on the subject of Washington. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution allows Congress to create a “District (not exceeding ten miles square)” to become the seat of government.

Initially, Congress was given complete control over the district’s legislation out of fears that a single state could wield too much power over the federal government. Later acts of Congress granted greater self-rule to the district, and the 23rd Amendment gave it three electoral votes. 

James Madison wrote in the Federalist No. 43 that the federal government needed to have supreme authority at the seat of government and warned of the accumulation of too much power in a single state: 

A dependence of the members of the general government on the State comprehending the seat of the government, for protection in the exercise of their duty, might bring on the national councils an imputation of awe or influence, equally dishonorable to the government and dissatisfactory to the other members of the Confederacy.

Pilon argued that “it would take a constitutional amendment” to make D.C. a state because of the 23rd Amendment.

“I don’t see this bill going anywhere,” he told the committee.

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., said statehood for the district would be “constitutional malfeasance.”

The possibility of the statehood bill passing into law seems slim.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told Fox News in June that D.C. statehood would give Democrats an advantage in the Senate and allow them to expand the Supreme Court. 

“They plan to make the District of Columbia a state—that would give them two new Democratic senators—Puerto Rico a state, that would give them two more new Democratic senators, and as a former Supreme Court clerk yourself, you’ve surely noticed that they plan to expand the Supreme Court,” he told Laura Ingraham. 

The district’s voters opted for Hillary Clinton by overwhelming margins in 2016, suggesting the district would elect Democratic members of Congress.

The Senate is split 53-47, the majority held by Republicans. D.C.’s admission would make that a 53-49 split, and if Puerto Rico became a state and elected two Democrats, it would make the Senate a 53-51 split. 

Why do advocates want D.C. to become a state? 

Bowser tweeted that the “denial of democracy in Washington, D.C. is voter suppression,” as well as a “civil rights injustice.”

“We have nobody to call in the Senate to speak for us. When there is a great debate on who sits in the Supreme Court, for example, who will decide how we have health care, how women will be able to exercise their rights, we have no voice,” she said at the hearing. 

Census Bureau data shows that 46.4% of the D.C. population is African American, 11.3% is Hispanic or Latino and 4.4% is Asian. 

The district’s population is larger than Wyoming and Vermont. 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., compared the district’s lack of political representation to Puerto Rico’s, where her family has roots. 

“Where the disenfranchisement of Puerto Ricans was rooted in the colonialist and imperialistic history that we’ve had in policies of the United States, the issue of D.C. statehood is rooted in a different evil in our history, which is the history of slavery in the United States,” she said. 

Ocasio-Cortez said the disenfranchisement of a majority-minority city was “upholding the injustice of the practices enacted during slavery.”

“We pay the most per capita in federal taxes. Our residents have fought and died in every US war. But we have the least in representation and self-government,” Norton wrote on Twitter. 

Advocates pointed to Congress’ ability to overrule D.C.’s laws, which can put the local government at odds with the federal government. 

President Barack Obama said in 2014 that he was for D.C. statehood, citing the need for political representation if city residents paid federal taxes. He put the district’s “Taxation Without Representation” license plates on the presidential limousine. 

President Donald Trump told The Washington Post editorial board in March 2016, “I don’t see statehood for D.C.”

Questions Using Close Reading and Critical Thinking:

  1. The first section of an article should answer the questions “Who?”, “What?”, “When?”, and “Where?” Identify the four Ws of this article. (Note: The rest of a news article provides details on the why and/or how.)
  2. Does this article appear to have a political bias? Why or why not?
  3. Advocates for D.C. statehood claim that the district’s current status “amounts to […] ‘voter suppression.’” What does voter suppression mean in general, and what does it mean in this debate? 
  4. Washington, D.C., already gets three electoral votes during presidential elections. What else would D.C. get if it were to be recognized as a state? Why do the residents of D.C. and other advocates think this is important?
  5. Why isn’t Washington, D.C., already a state? Are those reasons the same or different for why some people do not want D.C. to become a state today? Use specific details from the article to support your answer.
  6. In the section Why do advocates want D.C. to become a state? the following point is made: “The district’s population is larger than Wyoming and Vermont.” In your opinion, is this fact important in the argument for D.C. to receive statehood? Explain your opinion in a short paragraph, using the article at least once to support your position.

Read the original article here:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *